You are here: Home Fitness Industry Community Blog 2009 September 22 To bench press or not to bench press? That's the question

To bench press or not to bench press? That's the question

by MadeleineKyrke-Smith — last modified Sep 22, 2009 05:05 PM

The idea behind this is to start a discussion around the purpose of exercises that are not functional to everyday movement patterns...What's the point?

I was taking an Open Practical Forum the other day and a discussion came up about why we need to use exercises in a programme that are functional to everyday life. So here is my question: is there any point in doing exercises which are not functional?

 

Let’s look at a couple…. How is a bench press functional? When are you ever lying on your back pushing something up into the air? The bench press uses your chest, deltoids and arms. Because your back is fixed against a bench it is very hard to protract and retract (move) your scapular during the movement. As a result no back muscles can  be used. If you were ever to push something in real life with 2 arms directly in front, you would also use a number of back muscles and the rotator cuff (these muscles stabilise the shoulder joint) to stabilise the shoulder blade and shoulder during the movement. Since the majority of people sit at a computer all day and end up with “winged” shoulder blades and hunched shoulders shouldn’t we be encouraging exercises where our back muscles can be active?. Isn’t a push up more sensible?, obviously you are hardly ever in that position either, but you are at least using those stabilising muscles at the same time as you push ,which in the end is much more functional. To add to that, we don’t normally push things with 2 hands in the sagital plane (in front of us). The only thing I can think of pushing is a door, and I tend to do this with one hand and the rest of my body could be anywhere depending on what I have in my other hand. This brings into the equation even more back and shoulder muscles

 

Another example came up when discussing the pro’s and con’s of the Swiss Ball and Smith Squat. With both these exercises  the line of force  (where the load is acting on you) is behind the base of support (your feet) and therefore a lot of the load is being taken by the Swiss Ball. Also you are never in that position in real life, If you were you would fall over! Again, not a functional movement. What might be a more sensible option?

 

I am not saying only ever do squats or push-ups. For people who are rehabbing I can understand breaking down the movements as there are going to be weaker areas. However, for the general population, and maybe even more so athletes, what is the point of exercises that are not functional? Surely we can think of new exercises which are more useful? Feel free to suggest any you have found.

Document Actions

Comments (5)

Sally Easton Sep 23, 2009 04:14 PM
That's an interesting question. I once got talking to a guy that couldn't understand the concept of going to a gym to exercise. He was very proud of the fact that he did off road and hill running for cardio and legs, push ups and chin ups for chest and back, all within a 10km radius of his house, all completely for free and all totally functional. And there’s no doubt that the leg abductor machine in your average gym serves little purpose for most of us! If you are highly motivated, self disciplined, like exercising on your own, don't mind the cold, the dark, the wet and can kick yourself hard enough from time to time, then perhaps the guy had a point. I didn't spend too long talking about this with him as he was quite an abrasive chap (maybe the reason he was exercising alone?!) but did wonder if by exercising in a gym he would have challenged his musculo-skeletal system in a way that press ups just couldn’t have done, and the benefits that this would have given. Improving the musculature around his joints, strengthening his tendons and ligaments, stressing the bones to encourage them to become stronger (not to mention improving his neuromuscular system, motor patterning, sequencing, co-ordination etc) would all have helped to reduce his risk of injury when doing his other functional things.

So maybe by working 'dysfunctionally' you improve your ability to perform when working more functionally?
Steven Gourley Sep 23, 2009 08:46 PM
Okay, based on mum getting out of the bath tub a tricep dip/press might be functional. Based on me getting my vastus medius to sit up and take notice leg extensions may be functional (yes there are closed chain options but open chain isn't a bad thing mixed in). Based on my chest getting bigger and pulling my nipples into the north south position instead of arm-pit east west a bench press may be fine and functional. The definition of functional is not closed chain, integrated, primary movement pattern. It is more accepted as 'fit for purpose'. Therefore we must first identify the purpose and then we can chose the exercise. Keep an open mind, show me the hammer curls if 'suns out guns out' is the purpose. Any exercise can have value if it is 'fit for purpose'
MadeleineKyrke-Smith Sep 24, 2009 11:16 AM
I agree, tricep dips would be helpful for anyone getting out of that bath. However, both getting nipples pointing in the right direction and various muscles waking up can be done with much more functional movements. All my question was, was if we are going to do it, why not do it functionally for people without muscle imbalances. If someone was to come in with ONLY nipples all over the show and a single muscle not working very well then by all means they need to be worked on, I am sure that they would probably fit into the injury category though, as I don’t believe anyone could function like that for long without an injury occurring. Bicep curls are functional; I pick my coffee cup up like that all the time! I agree it needs to be based on what they need and want, I am just questioning what it is that they do in fact need. Do we run more of a risk of causing muscle imbalances even?
Daniel Speirs Sep 25, 2009 09:08 AM
Great blog maddie, you've stirred up some healthy debate here! Push ups certainly are a fantastic exercise, you can adapt tempo easilly to vary the effect, you can modify them to enable newbie's to do them and modify them to smash even the most advanced 'pusher' in the gym. They require nothing but a little floor space so when the muscleheads are monopolising the bench's in the gym you'll always be able to do them. Even the technically minded trainers out there like them cause they enable you to lie broomsticks along your spine to check spinal curvature for appropriateness (seriously I've seen it too many times). The definition of functionality is interesting though - who determines it? Ultimately the client really, so bench press is functional for someone who wants to boast to others about how much they can 'bench'. It is afterall one of the three official powerlifting exercises. Functionality for activities of daily living - then I'd agree push ups certainly have the edge. If your blog encourages a few people to question why they do what they do in the gym then it'll be a huge success. Oh P.S. those thigh adductors exercises are certainly functional but probably not for the purpose they were origonally intended...
Skux Deluxe Apr 06, 2010 04:52 PM
Nice blogg...

Login to comment

To make a comment on any of these blogs you need to login. If you are not a member, join now by clicking on the 'Join Free' button.

Membership is free and you can...

  • Get emails telling you about new jobs in your area
  • Get access to downloadable forms and tools to make life easy
  • Find out early about new resources and training that will suit you
  • Take part in industry forums and comment on blogs
Forgot your password?
Weblog Authors

Victoria Fleming

Victoria Fleming

Nadia Buxeda

Location: Auckland
Nadia Buxeda

Ashleigh Seagar

Location: Auckland
Ashleigh Seagar

Sarah Hobbs

Location: Wellington
Sarah Hobbs

Janine Reese

Location: Christchurch
Janine Reese

Liz Horner

Location: Auckland
Liz Horner

Hayden Roach

Location: Wellington
Hayden Roach

MadeleineKyrke-Smith

MadeleineKyrke-Smith

Steven Gourley

Location: Christchurch
Steven Gourley

Nardine Oakes

Location: Auckland
Nardine Oakes

Sally Easton

Location: Christchurch
Sally Easton
 
Web Design: MetaSolutions. -- Web & CMS Development: TheVirtual Ltd.